Charting the World
Which Countries Recycle the Most?
What is 'real' recycling? Which countries are the best in terms of real recycling? According to a new report by Eunomia, Taiwan ranked 6th in the top 25 recycling countries.
Which Countries Recycle the Most?By Alex Gray
Germany has the best recycling rate in the world. Austria comes in second, followed by South Korea and Wales. All four countries manage to recycle between 52% and 56% of their municipal waste. Switzerland, in fifth place, recycles almost half of its municipal waste.
According to Eunomia, the environmental consultancy that compiled the report, these countries all have in common government policies that encourage recycling, such as making it easy for households to recycle waste; good funding for recycling; and financial incentives. They also set clear performance targets and policy objectives for local governments.
Some countries, such as Wales, have ambitious recycling targets. Wales aims to achieve zero waste by 2050, and the EU is looking at adopting a new target for 2030, thought to be at least 65%.
The report singles out Wales, which it says outperforms many larger European countries because of its “political leadership and investment”. It says that Wales is a “global leader” in recycling and could outdo Germany, as early as 2018.
The Real Recycling Leaders
Recycling just over half of household waste may seem quite a low rate, but Eunomia says that reported recycling rates have been overstated.
For instance it has been reported that Sweden recycles almost all of its waste. But Eunomia says that’s only because the country counts energy recovery from waste incineration as a form of recycling, which it says is out of step with how the term “recycling” is generally used.
Singapore says that it recycles over 60% of its waste, but Eunomia calculated that much of this was actually commercial and industrial waste, and downgraded its total to 34%.
And as the chart below shows, countries’ reported recycling rates are much higher than in the first league table which Eunomia adapted to take into account the various ways in which recycling is measured.
Even Wales, which does well overall, includes significant amounts of rubble in its recycling rate, despite it not being consistently counted as a type of municipal waste across Europe. Wales had a reported rate of 64%, which Eunomia downgraded to 52%.
Commenting on the findings, report author and managing consultant at Eunomia Rob Gillies said: “It’s important to note this research has been carried out so we can identify who the real leaders in recycling are, to share best practice by shining a spotlight on what these countries are doing."
The report says that it is trying to compare municipal waste recycling rates on as equal a footing as possible, and calls for common definitions for municipal waste and recycling among countries.
“We also hope that this will help progress the debate on how best to measure ‘real’ recycling, in line with the principles of the waste hierarchy, in a way that is as consistent as possible within Europe and further afield,” Gillies said.
Wales, a 'global leader' in recycling, could outperform Germany as early as 2018. (Image: REUTERS/Chris Wattie)
What Happens to Recycled Waste?
A huge amount of recycling ends up being shipped to Asia. But China, the world’s largest importer and recycler of scrap metals, plastic and paper, has decided it will no longer take what it calls “foreign garbage”, and is set to ban imports of 24 types of waste.
And this may force industrialized countries to recycle more of their own waste.
Image: The Conversation
Currently Europe recycles 30% of its plastics, compared to just 9% in the United States, but the majority of plastic waste still winds up in landfills and in the oceans.
Original content can be found at the website of World Economic Forum.
This article is reproduced under the permission of World Economic Forum (WEF) and terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License (“CCPL”). It presents the opinion or perspective of the original author / organization, which does not represent the standpoint of CommonWealth magazine.